Loading...
 

Seymour v. Osborne

Name
Seymour v. Osborne
Cite
78 U.S. 516
Year
1870
Bluebook cite
Seymour v. Osborne, 78 U.S. 516 (1870).
Author
URL
78 U.S. 516
Item Type
case
Summary
Suit for infringement of patents for improvements in reaping machinery. One of the defenses to infringement was that the claimed inventions were merely combinations of old parts, “the combining of which involved no invention, but merely the skill of an intelligent mechanic or other person skilled in the manufacture and use of harvesting machines.” Id. at 547. The Supreme Court rejected this defense, first noting that new combinations of old parts may be patentable if new and useful, and then explaining the utility requirement (citing Lowell v. Lewis).

Excerpts and Summaries

Created
Thursday 13 of November, 2008 14:32:31 GMT
by Unknown
LastModif
Thursday 13 of November, 2008 14:32:31 GMT
by Unknown


Portions © 2006-2019 by Michael Risch, Some Rights Reserved | Copyright Notice| Legal Disclaimer