Loading...
 

Utility and Non-operability Standards in Biotechnology Patent Prosecution

Name
Utility and Non-operability Standards in Biotechnology Patent Prosecution
Cite
36 IDEA 203
Year
1996
Bluebook cite
Kevin C. Hooper, Utility and Non-operability Standards in Biotechnology Patent Prosecution: CAFC Precedent Versus PTO Practice, 36 IDEA 203 (1996).
Author
Kevin C. Hooper
URL
36 IDEA 203
Item Type
article
Summary
This article goes through the history of utility by discussing the Constitution, Kimmel, and Brenner. The article then discusses the changes by the PTO through substantial utility and prima facie utility. The article further discusses utility as it relates to operability and how the lack of utility causes non-operability. Finally, the article debates how much evidence is enough to prove utility and the new PTO guidelines.

Excerpts and Summaries

Created
Wednesday 24 of June, 2009 23:28:35 GMT
by Unknown
LastModif
Wednesday 24 of June, 2009 23:54:55 GMT
by Unknown


Portions © 2006-2019 by Michael Risch, Some Rights Reserved | Copyright Notice| Legal Disclaimer