The court stated that "As to utility, it may be said the invention was of small coverage and of even smaller importance. If the coin selector made possible the rejection of underweighted coins, or served better to eject such coins, it possessed utility. It is not the extent of the utility that governs, but the existence of some utility."
Excerpts and Summaries
Created
Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:27:58 GMT by Unknown
LastModif
Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:27:58 GMT by Unknown