In re Holmes

Name
In re Holmes
Cite
63 F.2d 642
Year
1933
Bluebook cite
In re Holmes, 63 F.2d 642 (1933).
Author
URL
63 F.2d 642
Item Type
case
Summary
The court ruled that for an "invention to be patentable must be useful, but need not be of greater usefulness than like devices or products shown in prior art."

Excerpts and Summaries

Created
Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:13:15 GMT
by Unknown
LastModif
Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:13:15 GMT
by Unknown


The original document is available at https://casesofinterest.com/tiki/item1741
Portions © 2006-2019 by Michael Risch, Some Rights Reserved | Copyright Notice| Legal Disclaimer