- Name
- In re Holmes
- Cite
- 63 F.2d 642
- Year
- 1933
- Bluebook cite
- In re Holmes, 63 F.2d 642 (1933).
- Author
- URL
- 63 F.2d 642
- Item Type
- case
- Summary
- The court ruled that for an "invention to be patentable must be useful, but need not be of greater usefulness than like devices or products shown in prior art."
Excerpts and Summaries
- Created
- Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:13:15 GMT
by Unknown
- LastModif
- Wednesday 26 of August, 2009 01:13:15 GMT
by Unknown
The original document is available at
https://casesofinterest.com/tiki/item1741