This case reviewed profit as to whether a patent covered use. The court held that, in the absence of proof to show how much of that profit was due to such other patents, and how much was a manufacturer's profit, complainant was entitled to nominal damages only.
Excerpts and Summaries
Created
Tuesday 25 of August, 2009 23:32:49 GMT by Unknown
LastModif
Tuesday 25 of August, 2009 23:32:49 GMT by Unknown