The court stated that the substantial utility of the device, as compared with the formerly known methods, cannot be seriously questioned. Additionally, the court ruled that the application of old material to new use, with some form of adaptation, may evidence invention.
Excerpts and Summaries
Created
Sunday 06 of September, 2009 14:10:52 GMT by Unknown
LastModif
Sunday 06 of September, 2009 14:10:52 GMT by Unknown